Friday, May 27, 2011

2011 MeeGo Conference

Photos by Marcus Siu


The MeeGo Conference was hosted by the Hyatt Regency in San Francisco.
Photo: by Marcus Siu

Hosted at the downtown Hyatt in San Francisco, CA, on May 23-25th, 2011, the MeeGo community looks to capitalize on its momentum. Positioned as an anticipated event for the future of open source mobile computing, on devices ranging from smart phones to in vehicle infotainment devices to netbooks and more, MeeGo 2011 San Francisco offers OSVs, OEMs, and other MeeGo project contributors a press-friendly stage to showcase their next generation devices and solutions.

MeeGo's Tech Showcase room at the Hyatt Regency.
.

Another Tech Showcase room at the Hyatt Regency, featuring Igalia and Qt.


Nomovok launches new Steelrat tablet platform at MeeGo Conference in Hyatt Regency San Francisco, 23.-25.5.2011. Steelrat is a launchpad for MeeGo tablet for companies aiming to create even better MeeGo products.

ICS presents a real world demonstration displaying real-time data from automotive control modules within a Qt Quick based user interface, a new paradigm for design focused user interface development for consumer devices such as mobile phones, media players, netbooks and set-top boxes.
.

 
Party goers let loose at the Exploratorium with food, hosted libations, and the 80's cover band Tainted Love.

 

About the MeeGo Conference San Francisco 2011

MeeGo Project

MeeGo is a Linux-based, open source operating system for small form factor devices. It was created with a unique user experience, designed from the beginning to look great on tablets, handheld devices, in-vehicle infotainment systems, smart TVs, netbooks, and more. MeeGo has a vibrant and active community of developers, enthusiasts, and users. MeeGo is a Linux Foundation project that was established in February 2010. Like with other open source projects, anyone can contribute to the MeeGo project and become a part of the MeeGo community. You can learn more at MeeGo.com.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

13 ASSASSINS - MOVIE REVIEW


Koji Yakusho in 13 ASSASSINS, a Magnet Release. Photo courtesy of Magnet Releasing.

Imagine the epic scale of Akira Kurosawa’s samurai masterpieces, such as “Seven Samurai” and “Ran”, with its grandeur cinematic landscape and its unrivaled action sequences combined with the uncompromising violence helmed by the “Asian extremist” visionary, Japanese director, Takashi Miike, director of the “Ichi the Killer”, undoubtedly one of the most disturbing films ever.
In fairness to Miike, you can’t judge a director from just one film.  Especially if he’s done well over eighty of them over his prolific ten year career, averaging about three to four per year.  (He makes more films a year than most people get their oil changed in a year.)  His genre of films range all over the map; from Romantic Horror (“Audition”), Nouveau Western (“Sukiyaki Western Django”), New Musical (“Happiness of the Katakuri’s”), or Yakuza (“Dead or Alive”).   

Did I mention he does family-friendly films, as well?
Regardless of the genre, all of his films are unquestionably “over the top” and an “acquired taste” to an eccentric audience, mainly male, who are usually quite forgiving given the unevenness quality of his output, but have an insatiable and intoxicating appetite for more.  Many of Miike fans are in it for the shock value, but also have come to known him as a filmmaker who is out to surprise his audience, as well.   Regardless of what you think of his films, you will find the directors’ trademark all over each of them. 

 “13 Assassins”, a remake from the 1963 Japanese film, doesn’t seem to cram the story with scenes of excessive violence of blood, gore, decapitation, like the outlandish “Ichi the Killer” did.  This time around, the excessive violence is mostly justified and actually embellishes the story, making it quite authentic and credible.  After all, it is a real “slasher” movie.
Based on a true incident, the movie takes place in Feudal Japan in 1844, at a time when peace reigns, and samurai’s are set in “relax” mode.   This quickly changes, as soon as the film opens with a stark and brutal scene showing a hara-kiri of a nobleman.   Though no fault of his own, he takes his own life due to the shame of his innocent daughter, though no fault of her own, had disgraced the family because she was raped and murdered by the ruler, Lord Naritsugu.  It was also an act by the family of protest of having a savage, such as Lord Naritsugu, as a ruler.  

Rather than peace, Lord Naritsugu wants to change the country by governing it through the power of war.   Because he is the young brother of the Shogun, he is in power and can do anything he pleases, especially with all his devoted guards by his side.  He is also in line to be Shogun, leader of Japan. 
He is keenly obsessed with his own forms of sadistic violence.  He enjoys the fear that he instills on his victims.  At will, he will rape, kill, and dismember for sheer pleasure, just because he has the power and no one will stop him.   Not even women, children and babies are safe from his whimsical actions.  He is a merciless tyrant.  Just ask the limbless woman whom he used as a plaything…oops, she can’t talk.

Naturally, there are some people around him not approving of his actions, including a former shogun advisor, who secretly hires Shinzaemon Shimada (Koji Yakusho) (Shall We Dance, Memoirs of a Geisha, Babel) to kill Lord Naritsugu, before he takes over the throne and starts to endanger the lives of the entire country.   
Like “Seven Samurai”, the film shows how the assassins are rounded up and why they wish to fight.  Shimada hires eleven samurai, along with his nephew.  Even though they all have different reasons for fighting, (glory, money, revenge) they all have the same duty and honor of a samurai; to bravely fight and die as a samurai.   

Before the assassins leave, Hanbei, an old rival and sparring partner of Shimada’s, and now Naritsugu’s samurai meet and try to dissuade each other from their goals.  Neither budges.  
The thirteenth assassin, Koyata, like Toshiro Mifune’s,  Kikuchiyo , whom we later meet along the way, adds some surrealistic comic relief to the film, and it works to the films advantage.  

The last third of the movie is an unrelenting, forty five minute action battle sequence.  This is quite a remarkable spectacle: complete with samurai swords, bows and arrows, explosives, and booby traps galore, in a village that is camouflaged to entrap Naritsugu and his army.  This is well worth the price of admission alone. 
Though, the characters are not quite as well compassionately defined as Kurosawa’s, the film is quite remarkable, nevertheless.  Miike has rarely been this accessible, and the film demands to be seen on the big screen, as it is a cinematic feast and a grand action samurai film.   The sets, costumes, and art direction are reason alone to see if at your local theatre, if you are lucky to find one nearby.  Don’t wait for it on video.  You’ll do yourself a disservice…unless this movie doesn’t sound like your cup of tea.

website:  http://www.13assassins.com/

Cast:  Koji Yakusho, Takayuki Yamada, Yusuke Iseya, Goro Inagaki, Masachika Ichimura, Mikijiro Hira, Hiroki Matsukata, Ikki Sawamura, Arata Furuta, Tsuyoshi Ihara, Masataka Kubota,Sousuke Takaoka Director: Takeshi Miike Screenwriter: Daisuke Tengan Executive producers: Toshiaski Nakazawa, Jeremy Thomas, Takashi Hirajo Producers: Michihiko Umezawa, Minami Ichikawa, Toichiro Shiraishi, Takahiro ohno, Hirotsugu Yoshida, Shigeji Maeda Director of photography: Nobuyasu Kita Production designer: Yuji Hayashida Music: Koji Endo Costumes: Kazuhiro Sawataishi Editor: Kenji Yamashita

 Running time: 126 minutes

Koji Yakusho in 13 ASSASSINS, a Magnet Release. Photo courtesy of Magnet Releasing

Sunday, April 10, 2011

SOUL SURFER - EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS CLOSING NIGHT CINEQUEST


The beautiful California Theatre


AnnaSophia Robb, interviewer Marc Silber, surfer Jeff Clark, Bethany Hamilton

AnnaSophia Robb & Bethany Hamilton

AnnaSophia Robb and interviewer, Marc Silber

Director of "Soul Surfer", Sean McNamara


Closing Night Party at South First Billiards

Kathleen Powell interviews AnnaSophia Robb and Bethany Hamilton.

Maverick Award winners AnnaSophia Robb and Bethany Hamilton

Marcus Siu and AnneSophia Robb

Bethany Hamilton and Marcus Siu

Friday, April 8, 2011

SOUL SURFER

Bethany (AnnaSophia Robb) and Alana (Lorraine Nicholson) are competitors on the water, best friends on shore.

Imagine your favorite outdoor recreational activity almost ending abruptly in a near death experience.   The horrifying nightmare will probably stay with you forever.  It happened to mountain climber, Aron Ralston, portrayed by James Franco in the film, “127 Hours”.  Ralston literally went out on a limb and was stuck between a rock and a hard place in Utah.   A similar and equally terrifying accident also happened to surfer, Bethany Hamilton, who nearly met the “jaws of death, losing her left arm, along with over 60% of her blood, somewhere in the waters of Kauai.   Like Ralston, she was extremely lucky to make it out alive.
Based on Hamilton’s autobiography, “The Endless Summer”, “Soul Surfer” is a term coined in the 1970's and used to describe a talented surfer who surfs for the sheer pleasure of surfing (although they may still enter in competitions, winning may not be the main motive) - since they scorn the commercialization of surfing. 
Perhaps, Brad Melekian, defines the term “soul surfer” more clearly, which was written from a 2005 article in Surfer magazine:
“...to pursue surfing not just as an athletic endeavor or as a sunny day diversion, but to try to glean whatever lessons you can from the practice. It means being aware of your surroundings, and respectful of the people and places that you interact with. It means being patient, mindful, kind, compassionate, understanding, active, thoughtful, faithful, hopeful, gracious, disciplined and…good.”
After seeing the film and reading what Melekian quoted, I now fully understand why the film was not called “Surfing with Sharks”. 
AnnaSophia Robb (Because of Winn Dixie, Bridge to Terabithia, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Sleepwalking) plays the youthful and spirited teenager, Bethany Hamilton, who had already been creating waves for herself as a surfer.  Since the age of eight, her skills catapulted her rapidly into the limelight, competing and winning many championships within her age group in her hometown island of Kauai.  With the constant ongoing encouraging and motivational support from her parents, well played by Dennis Quaid and Helen Hunt, along with her brothers, who are also avid surfers; it was only a matter of time when she would start thinking about turning professional.
Then her young life changed.  While laying sideways on her floating surfboard in the sunny waters at Tunnels Beach in Kauai, a 15 foot tiger shark attacked her and tore her left arm off,   Luckily, at the time, she was with her best friend, Alana, who witnessed the horror, and with the aid of her family, rushed Hamilton to a medical team, saving her life.  Hamilton was only thirteen years old.
Her life would never be the same for her after the incident.   She was no longer able to do the things that required coordination of both of her hands that she took for granted, like spreading butter on a slice of toast, let alone paddling with both hands in the water. Many of the locals treated her like some kind of mutant.  The press and paparazzi constantly harassed her in public, as well as at her own home.   Even makers of prosthetic arm products tried to capitalize on her, attempting to have her sponsor their product.
Feeling sorry for herself, she joins World Vision, an organization that helps young children who were devastated by the tsunami disaster in Thailand.  In one scene, she helps reacquaint the children to overcome their fear of the water.  Being in this supportive position, she realizes that she may have been the fortunate one, since she had succeeded in overcoming her fear of water, as well.
Sean McNamara, known mainly as a TV Director, does a first rate job capturing the mood and spirit surrounding the exciting surf competitions of Kauai.  Some of the cinematography of the surf scenes were quite breathtaking, probably because much of the footage was actually of the real life Bethany Hamilton, who was used as her own character’s stunt double.   No need for CGI in those scenes.
Even though you may know the story, the film is still quite entertaining, and is well written and strongly casted.  Robb’s performance is quite moving, filled with every possible emotion you can ask for in a role, especially for a teenage girl.   Look for Carrie Underwood, Kevin Sorbo, and Craig T Nelson in supportive roles.  
The story of Bethany Hamilton is quite inspirational, life affirming, and has all the qualities to make this a terrific family film.  It carries a clear message and makes us all a better person.  If you like “The Blind Side”, you will also love this film, as well.  Though, personally, I believe “Soul Surfer” has more of a bite to it.

Reviewed by Marcus Siu
Opens nationwide - Friday, April 8, 2011.
Director:SeanMcNamara;Producers:DavidZelon,DouglasSchwartz,DutchHofstetter,DavidBrookwell,
SeanMcNamara,DavidTice(Executive),DominicIanno(Executive);
Writers:SeanMcNamara,DeborahSchwartz,DouglasSchwartzandMichaelBerk(screenplay),BethanyHamiltonautobiography);Cinematographer:JohnR.Leonetti;
Editors:JeffW.Canavan,DavidW.Hager;Music:MarcoBeltrami;
Cast:AnnaSophiaRobb,DennisQuaid,HelenHunt,JeremySumpter,KevinSorbo,
CraigT.Nelson,CarrieUnderwood,LorraineNicholson Length: 106 min.; Genre: Drama

 

                          From left to right - Bethany Hamilton and AnnaSophia Robb.                          
Photo Credit - Mario Perez.

Courtesy of FilmDistrict and TriStar.
 


Wednesday, March 9, 2011

CINEQUEST FILM FESTIVAL 21 - WAR GAMES AND THE MAN WHO STOPPED THEM

War Games and the Man Who stopped them
Reviewed by Lidia Thompson & Marcus Siu

1. Ryszard Kuklinski at the Warsaw Pact Conference, 1980
© Apple Film Production
Were it not for the actions of one Polish Colonel, we might all be living in the wreckage of a nuclear war – Charlie Cockey
In the 1970s, the Warsaw Pact armies under the USSR control occupied Poland and most of Central Europe. The Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance, commonly known as the Warsaw Pact, was a mutual defense treaty, subscribed to by eight communist countries in Europe.   In May 1955, it was established by the USSR’s initiative and realized in Warsaw, as a military response to an integration of West Germany to NATO Pact.
Colonel Ryszard Kukliński, who served over twenty years in the rank with the Polish Army, solely subordinated to political interests of the Soviet Empire. In 1972, Kukliński contacted the CIA, and for nine years, handed them over 40,000 secret Warsaw Pact documents.  His position had made him one of the most important sources of information that the Western world had in the Soviet Bloc during the Cold War era. His increasing knowledge about the Warsaw Pact plans, while working in the Operation Board of the General Staff, also played a significant role.  According to the plans, Poland could be destroyed and become a nuclear desert as a result from a possible third World War.  In 1980, after the Solidarity movement was established, Kukliński continued to inform Washington about the Polish government plans to suppress the Solidarity movement and implement the Martial law in Poland.  In November 1981, with his covert operations close to being exposed, Kukliński and his family evacuated to Berlin, and then afterwards, to the United States. On December 13th, 1981, the Martial law was established in Poland, becoming reality; military vehicles and soldiers patrolled the major cities of Poland, telephone lines were disconnected, airports and main roads access were closed.  Democracy was suppressed for eight long years.   
In 1984, in a secret court trial, the Warsaw Military Court sentenced Kukliński  to death.  In 1990, a year after the communist regime collapsed, his death sentence was changed to 25 years in prison.   In 1995, his sentence was cancelled and his ranking of Colonel was completely restored.  In 1998, he visited Poland but never returned, remaining in exile during the last years of his life in the United States.   His decision to not return to Poland remained controversial, as the Polish people did not know whether or not to deem him as a hero or a traitor. That issue was never fully solved for many Poles.   
“War Games and the Man Who Stopped Them”, written, directed and produced by Dariusz Jablonski, is a well done documentary.   Jablonski approaches the story from many angles by interviewing the members of the highest echelons from both sides and those most closely associated with Kukliński; from the U.S. head of espionage, General William E. Odom to the Warsaw Pact, Commander-in-Chief Viktor Kulikov, the Polish General, Wojciech Jaruzelski, and former Polish President, Lech Walesa, and to friends and family.  The film asks probing questions about Kukliński .  When did he become convinced to make his move to contact the CIA?  Did he ever regret what he did?  
In addition to the extensive archive footage, we see the officials during tightly-framed interviews and meetings in voice-over filmed with a small, often half-hidden camera.  Photos of Kukliński come to life with 3D motion effects, and the recurring theme of the war games.
Internationally renowned, Dariusz Jablonski, a graduate of the Directing Department at the Film Academy in Lodz, and recipient of many national and international awards, worked on some of the most ambitious film projects of Polish cinema in the Eighties.  He was the First Assistant Director on “The Decalogue” (1989), directed by Krzysztof Kieslowski, and a First Assistant Director on “Magnat” (1987) directed by Filip Bajon.  Jablonski is also member of the European Film Academy and the Board of the European Producers Club.  He is the founder of Apple Film Production; one of the first and leading independent production company in Poland, which to date has produced 21 documentaries, nine feature films and 15 television series.  
Director: Dariusz Jablonski; Producers: Izabela Wojcik, Violetta Kaminska; Co-producer: Patrik Pass; Writer: Dariusz Jablonski; Cinematographers: Tomasz Michalowski, Pawel Banasiak; Editors: Milenia Fiedler, Bartosz Pietras; Music: Michal Lorenc; Cast; Józef Szaniawski, Hanna Kuklińska, Stanisław Radaj, Zbigniew Brzeziński, Walter Lang; Countries: Poland, Slovakia; Language: English; Length: 110 min.; Genre: Drama
War Games and the Man Who Stopped Them plays on March 5th at 1:30pm, March 9th at 9:30pm, and March 10th at 3:45.  All screenings are at the Camera 12.
2. Ryszard Kuklinski at his yacht
© Apple Film Production

Saturday, March 5, 2011

CINEQUEST FILM FESTIVAL 21 - IRENA SENDLER

IRENA SENDLER: IN THE NAME OF THEIR MOTHERS
Reviewed by Lidia Thompson & Marcus Siu
Courtesy of Cinequest 2011


As a Polish Catholic social worker, Irena Sendler along with a group of young women in Nazi-occupied Poland managed to rescue 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw Ghetto.  They smuggled them under garbage, in suitcases, in boxes, though the canals, as well as other inconceivable passageways that would rescue them from being deported to the concentration camps, saving their lives from the Nazis.  Their unspeakable act of heroism and bravery was kept quiet for decades during the communist era.  The documentary “Irena Sendler: In the Name of Their Mothers”, directed and co-produced by American filmmaker Mary Skinner, brings this miraculous and profound story of human goodness to life.  Extensive archive footage and interviews with survivor, Sendler, her co-workers and the children she had rescued, is indeed, an unforgettable experience. 
In 1939, when World War II began, over 3 million Jews lived in Poland with 400,000 residing in Warsaw, making up one third of its population.  In 1940, the Warsaw Ghetto was established and was the largest of all the ghettos in Nazi-occupied Europe.  The conditions in the Warsaw Ghetto were unbearable and worsening each day.   In 1941, the average food rations for Jews were limited to 186 calories, compared to 1,669 calories for Poles and 2,614 calories for Germans.  People in the Ghetto were starving and dying on the streets, while hundreds of orphans begged for a piece of bread.  The situation was traumatic for everyone, but especially for defenseless children. 
Irena Sendler was 29 when the Nazis invaded Poland.  She served as a social worker in the Polish Underground and later with the Żegota Resistance Organization.  As an employee of the Warsaw Social Welfare Department, she had a special permit to enter the Warsaw Ghetto to check for signs of Typhus; something the Nazis feared would spread beyond the Ghetto.  During these visits she and her co-workers intercepted approximately 2,500 Jewish children and smuggled them to safety, rescuing them from their certain death in concentration camps.   Their risk of helping Jews in any way was extremely dangerous; if they were discovered by the Nazi’s.
“Nothing was more dangerous than as hiding a Jew” quotes, Polish Resistance Activist, Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, “because if you are hiding a box of ammunition, you don’t need to feed it every day, you don’t have to care for it if it becomes ill, and the neighbors don’t need to know about it”.  Not only did Sendler and those young women smuggle Jewish children out of the Ghetto, but they also provided them with false documents sheltering them in Polish families, and then were sent off to safer places like the catholic convents outside Warsaw.  In addition, Sendler maintained the identities of those young survivors.  She buried a jar keeping track of their original Jewish names along with their newly created Polish names, so when the war ended they could be reunited with their parents, if they were still alive.  In 1943, Sendler was arrested by the Gestapo, severely tortured, and sentenced to death, but in the last minute was rescued by the Polish Resistance.  She survived World War II, but during the communist regime she was prosecuted because of her connections with the Polish Resistance.  Her story was unknown for many years.
In 1999, Kansas students produced a play based on research into Irena Sendler's life story entitled “Life in a Jar”.  This drama has now been performed over 285 times across the United States, Canada and in Poland.  It has since been adapted to television as “The Courageous Heart of Irena Sendler” and over 1,500 media stories.
Mary Skinner, director of the documentary, acknowledged on the official film website, “I grew up with stories about the courage and compassion of Polish heroines like Irena Sendler.  I heard about them from my Polish mother.  She was barely a teenager in 1941, when she was rounded up in Warsaw and sent to a concentration camp for smuggling food.  Her father had been killed, her mother was dying, and her brother and sister had already been taken.  No one else in her family survived the war. 
But my mother never forgot the ordinary women like Irena Sendler – the ‘angels of mercy’ in Warsaw who detested war, but would go to the devil for a war-wounded child like her.  Right before my mother died, I felt I needed to find those women, to tell their stories, to remember them.”
Director: Mary Skinner; Producers: Mary Skinner, Betsy Bayha, Piotr Piwowarczyk, Richard Wormser, Jan Legnitto, Paul Mitchell, Richard Adams; Cinematographers: Andrzej Wolf, Slawomir Grunberg; Editors: Marta Wohl, Anna Ksiesopolska; Music: Tom Disher; Countries: USA, United Kingdom; Language: English, German, and Polish, (w/ English subtitles); Length: 60 min.; Genre: Documentary

Preceded by the short film: Living For 32; Director: Kevin Breslin; 40 min.; USA; The inspirational story of a survivor of the tragic Virginia Tech shooting massacre and his courageous journey of renewal and hope.

Irena Sendler: In the Name of Their Mothers plays Sunday, March 6th, 2011 at 2pm at the San Jose Repertory, and Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 at 9pm at the Camera 12.

Friday, March 4, 2011

CINEQUEST FILM FESTIVAL 21 - MIDNIGHT SON



MIDNIGHT SON (USA)  
After having vampire symptoms and watching a vampire video on his TV, Jacob (Zak Kilberg) tests to see what would happen if he put a wooden cross against his forehead. He is happily surprised that his forehead did not burn.

Vampire movies produced in today’s Hollywood system have become too “popcorn” for my tastes.  I have become quite cynical when I see endless lines of teenage girls camped out several days in advance for a special midnight advance screening of the latest in the series of a franchise movie at their local Cineplex, so they can scream and drool over their favorite heartthrob, and perhaps, see the movie at least two or three more times before it is mandatory for them to return to school the following Monday. 
Not to say these particular movies don’t have any redeeming values to them.  If you look past all the blatant supernatural visual effects and vampire cliché’s that Hollywood bestows on its audiences, you will see that there can be something a little more cerebral hidden behind all those computer graphics (CGI). 
Recent international offerings in the last couple of years brought us a new wave of realism for vampire films, such as Sweden’s “Let the Right One In” and Korea’s “Thirst”, which make watching them a much more thought provoking and intriguing.   The independently made, “Midnight Son” belongs to this group, as it gives the overdone genre a new fresh perspective.  
Jacob (Zak Kilberg), a 24-year old security guard who works nights, has a rare skin disorder that prevents him from going out during the day.  He seals off his windows in his basement apartment, so he is not exposed to sunlight.   While painting artistic sunsets on canvas, he starts to discover that whatever he eats (mainly microwavable meals loaded with carbohydrates), his appetite is not satisfied, regardless of how much food he consumes.  He is diagnosed by a doctor who tells him his body is malnourished and thinks Jacob is lying about him “eating like a horse”, and tells him that his body is craving something.   As each night progresses, his body continues to change; much like a caterpillar turning into a butterfly.
As he starts to slurp the beef juices from the Styrofoam meat packages, he begins to recognize what his body truly craves.  Replenishing his empty Starbucks coffee cup with “red liquid” that he picked up at the local neighborhood meat market, he walks around naturally along the streets and into late night video stores.  He is slowly transforming into what we know as a vampire, but he is still trying to figure it out for himself, as his diet continues to change before us.   To fulfill his new appetite, he finds more creative ways to find his meal, so he doesn’t grow weak. 
In the meantime, Zak’s only social outlet is going to the neighborhood bar in the wee hours of the night, where he meets Mary (Maya Parish), who gets his attention by selling him candy and cigarettes outside the bar.  As they get to know each other, a relationship between them starts to bloom and develop.  At the same time, his condition worsens, as does Mary’s, who also has personal problems of her own, as well.   Strange things start happening even at work, where Zak becomes oblivious to strange events that happened nearby, surprising even the police department.  This is where the film takes you in for a wild ride. 
Director and writer, Scott Leberecht, along with an all around excellent cast led by Zak Kilberg and Maya Parish, create a moving, sort of a “coming of age” vampire movie; injecting humanity and compassion into their characters.   The chemistry within the two leads is quite natural and credible as they begin their relationship and both try to overcome their personal struggles.   
From the opening notes of the eerie musical score to some bleak cinematography, this is one film that grabbed me from the beginning and took me on a journey in different directions.   “Midnight Son” is an impressive feature film debut for Leberecht, and I certainly hope to see him continue his work as a filmmaker.   After all, “Everybody’s got their thing”.

Reviewed by Marcus Siu


Director: Scott Leberecht; Producers: Scott Leberecht, Matt Compton; Executive Producers: Eduardo Sanchez, Reed Frerichs; Writer: Scott Leberecht; Cinematographer: Lyn Moncrief; Editors: Ian McCamey, Scott Leberecht; Music: Kays Alatrakchi; Cast: Zak Kilberg, Maya Parish, Jo D. Jonz, Larry Cedar, Tracey Walter, Arlen Escarpeta; Country: USA; Language: English; Length: 88 min.; Genre: Drama

Midnight Son plays on March 4th at 9:30pm at San Jose Repertory Theatre, March 6th at 6:45pm at the Camera 12, and March 11th at 12:30pm at the Camera 12.

Jacob (Zak Kilberg) tries to conceal himself from Mary (Maya Parish) after his eyes turn yellow in a very intimate moment.
 

Friday, February 25, 2011

CINEQUEST FILM FESTIVAL 21 - COPACABANA

Films worth seeing in San Jose at Cinequest 21
COPACABANA

Esméralda (Lolita Chammah) reunites with her mother, Babou (Isabelle Huppert) in Ostend, who recently gets a promotion in her new job selling time-shares.

No serious International film festival is complete without an appearance with the great French actress, Isabelle Huppert, who transcends just about any role that is offered to her.  In this French comedy, directed by Marc Fitoussi, she plays Babou, an unconventional, independent, and eccentric single mother living with her 22 year old daughter in Tourcoing, a city in Northern France.   Babou doesn’t want to be tied down to any jobs, responsibilities, serious relationships, or even confined into any one routine.   Rather, she would rather be free and imagine herself in new and untraveled places that she hasn’t been to, such as Brazil, even though she can only imagine it, since she cannot afford to fly there.
Babou’s daughter,  Esméralda, (Lolita Chammah, who is Huppert’s daughter in real life) after returning home from a night with her boyfriend, tells her mother that she is planning to get married and wants to live a normal middle class life, instead of the bohemian lifestyle that her mother lives.  She also tells her that she doesn’t want her to be present at the wedding, not only because she is too poor to afford it, but because she is self absorbed and is too embarrassed of her behavior to have her there.  
Emotionally hurt about the announcement, Babou decides to leave her home, as well as her social circle of friends, including Burt; her male friend who is secretly in love with her.  She lands a job handing out flyers to help spur interest for potential customers to buy time share apartments in Ostend, a seaport city in Belgium, during the off-season. There, we meet quite a cast of characters that both befriend and clash with her, including a young homeless couple, Kurt and Sophie, whom she helps find shelter when she can; Lydie (Aure Atika), who plays the part of a tough woman boss in order to motivate her “flyer” helpers increase sales calls, but shows she can put her “act” away when she lets her guard down; and for comic relief, her suspicious roommate, Irene, whom never trusted Babou the moment she met her, well played  by Chantal Banlier, who probably gets the most laughs in this film.
Fitoussi, who also wrote the well paced story, focuses mainly on Babou, as Huppert, whom is almost in every single shot.  The camera and supporting cast revolve around her quite adequately, but it is Huppert who makes the film shine.   
Copacabana is not just about a relationship and unconditional love between a mother and a daughter, but also about not having to abandon your personal values to stay true to yourself.  After all Babou, is determined to gain back her daughter’s love anyway she can, and will do it at any risk.  
Reviewed by Marcus Siu

Director: Marc Fitoussi; Producer: Caroline Bonmarchand; Writer: Marc Fitoussi; Cinematographer: Helene Louvart; Editor: Martine Giordano; Music:Tim Gane and Sean O’Hagan; Cast: Isabelle Huppert , Lolita Chammah , Aure Atika , Jurgen Delnaet, Chantal Banlier; Country: France; Language: French (w/ English subtitles) ; Length: 90 min.; Genre: Comedy

Copacabana plays on March 2nd at 9:15pm at the California Theatre, March 4th at 12:30pm at the Camera 12, and March 7th at 7pm at the California Theatre.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

CINEQUEST FILM FESTIVAL 21 - MAMA GÓGÓ

Films worth seeing in San Jose at Cinequest 21

 
MAMMA GÓGÓ

Unfortunately, not all nursing homes are perfect for containing their patients, especially, when Alzheimer patients can be quite deceiving, like Mamma Gógó often demonstrates. 

There is a time when children of their parents need to make a decision on what to do with them when they can no longer take care of themselves.  Not because their elderly bodies start failing them, but because they start to become oblivious to their own surroundings, causing physical damage around them, as well as affecting the people who are most dearest to them.  
Mamma Gógó is a semi-autobiographical film by director, Fridrik Thór Fridriksson, whose film “Children of Nature” received an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Film in 1992.  It was the first and only time Iceland was ever represented in this category at the Oscars.  Fridriksson’s latest film is based on his personal, and at times, comedic experiences with his real life mother who had Alzheimer’s disease, while his professional career was collapsing under him, at the same time.  
Ironically, the movie opens up with a premiere of “the director’s” (Hilmir Snær Guðnason) latest film called, “Children of Nature”, which from the audience reactions, looks like it is already doomed for commercial failure.   His original intention was to make an artistic, political and insightful film targeted for a much older audience, but later on, realizes that this particular audience doesn’t go to the movies.  As time passes, and hardly anyone sees his film, he optimistically envisions that it will be well accepted in the US, and maybe even be nominated for an Academy Award, and save the Icelandic Film industry.   No one buys this opinion, except for his always supportive loving mother.
As his own personal debt starts to pile up, he starts to have a string of bad luck.  His vehicle gets towed away while he helplessly watches from his bedroom window; his credit card gets cut up in small pieces by a waitress who tells him that she was instructed to do so by the credit card company; and even the Hollywood blockbuster movie deal that he thought was locked in as a director, became null and void. 
In the meantime, Mamma Gógó’s (Kristbjörg Kjeld) sharp wit and memory starts to slowly fade and deteriorate.   She leaves the stove unoccupied while boiling pasta, slowly drifting asleep in the living room while watching her sons’ movie.  Her neighbor, aware of the smoke from her apartment, pounds on her door to get her out.  A few days later, she gets out of bed and steps onto a puddle of water, forgetting to turn the facet off, flooding the apartment below.  She even becomes suspicious with the children, falsely accusing them of taking her keys and gold jewelry, when she misplaced the items herself.
Without hesitation, her children decide to put Mamma Gógó into a full time nursing home, even with the “director’s” ongoing financial problems.  None of the children were motivated to put up with her full time.  The director’s life, already in turmoil, needed to rebalance his own life, as even his loving wife starts to doubt his credibility the way things are going.
As Mamma Gógó starts tuning out of the present and hallucinating more into the past, she starts having romantic visions of her late beloved husband.   Contrasting black and white shots, representing their nostalgic youth fifty years ago, intertwined with vivid colors, representing a time much closer to the present day, we see the couple together enraptured with each other, even after 50 years.  
The director realizes that even with all his personal turmoil and his career tumbling down, his mother was the most important person who he cared about above all else, and that he wasn’t quite able to say everything that he wanted to say to her before she tuned out of the world.  It’s almost like the curtain went down suddenly on a show that you thought would continue.
Writer/Director Fridrik Thór Fridriksson, does an admirable job in balancing the compassion and humor in his script, as well as eloquently directing the fine cast, whose two leads, Kjeld and Guðnasonm were quite moving.   Also worth noting is the breathtaking cinematography by Ari Kristinsson , who captured much of Iceland’s natural landscape beauty, and also Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson’s exquisite score.
This was Iceland’s official submission to this year’s Academy Awards. 
Reviewed by Marcus Siu

Director: Fridrik Thór Fridriksson; Producers: Fridrik Thór Fridriksson, Gudrún Edda Thórhannesdóttir; Writer: Fridrik Thór Fridriksson; Cinematographer: Ari Kristinsson; Editors: Sigvaldi J. Kárason, Tomas Potocny, Andres Refn; Music: Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson; Cast: Kristbjörg Kjeld, Hilmir Snær Guðnason, Gunnar Eyjólfsson, Margrét Vilhjálmsdóttir; Country: Iceland; Language: Icelandic (w/ English subtitles); Length: 90 min.; Genre: Drama

Mama Gógó, Preceded by the short film, Sunday’s Best, plays on March 2nd at 7pm at the California Theatre, March 4th at 7:30pm at the Camera 12, and March 6th at 11:15am at the Camera 12.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

SEARCHING FOR CHOPIN

Written and photographed by Marcus Siu and Lidia Thompson
exclusively for PoloniaSF.org

The famous Chopin autograph sign hanging above the stage at the National Philharmonic, home of the Warsaw Philharmonic, and venue for the 16th Annual International Chopin Piano Competition.

My sheer appreciation of classical piano music didn’t quite develop until early on during my adult years.  It probably didn’t help when I was forced into taking piano lessons at the innocent age of twelve, fiendishly schemed and executed perfectly by my mother, despite my repetitive refusals to comply.  The real reason, of course, was that I feared that my pre-teen image would be greatly tarnished by the younger kids of the neighborhood.  I couldn’t let that happen.
At that time of my life, I was much more interested in rock music.  The Rolling Stones was my idea of what classical music should be.   Though, I didn’t really form much of an opinion in “classical” music in my teens, I definitely enjoyed hearing to it in movies, especially in such great films, such as Stanley Kubrick’s “2001 – A Space Odyssey”.   Nowadays, when I hear a Johann Strauss waltz, I no longer think of 18th century revelers in Venetian masks and fancy gowns, dancing in a grand ballroom with twenty foot chandeliers hanging above them; but instead, slow rotating floating space stations or airline stewardesses walking carefully down the aisles in zero gravity.
My piano teacher recognized my passive taste for classical music immediately and offered different genres of music to keep me motivated in learning the instrument.  Unfortunately, I spent most of my practicing hours learning kitschy popular piano pieces to near perfection, but put aside anything remotely classical, since I had no idea what the music was supposed to sound like. 
Ironically, five years later, I started working for the Art & Music department at the Berkeley Public Library, which changed my whole perspective on classical music completely.   Oddly, the strict policy of the department, developed by the senior librarian, was to exclusively play classical music recordings, excluding any type of vocal music, including opera that would “distract the patrons”. 
Since all the librarians had different tastes in classical music, it still came down to what was “acceptable” to everyone, as anyone had the authority to veto the selection.  Chopin and Mozart were the only two composers that were unanimously accepted in the department.   In other words, no one ever found offense in Chopin or Mozart’s music.   Notably, the most played record, regardless of performer, was the Chopin Waltzes.
Discovery….
One day, I was driving through the beautiful scenic valleys of Sonoma County in Northern California, listening to the local classical music station on the car stereo.  After missing out on the announcement of the piece, I turned up the dial to see if I could identify the music and composer myself.   I was drawn in immediately after the opening few bars of the solo piano were heard.  The music demanded attention.  I slowed the car rolling up the windows, so I could hear every single note, including the quietest and softest passages of the music in my car.
The music had Chopin written all over it.  Familiar with only his waltzes at the time, it initially sounded like it could have been a sonata; but I wasn’t certain.   It led me to an unfamiliar journey filled with poetry and harmonics, leading into loud and thunderous chords during the middle passages, and long running scales that transcended and sped to a thrilling climax.  It was unpredictable where the music was going, which added greatly to the tension.   I was in complete awe after listening to the final note.   I didn’t realize how expressive and dramatic piano music can sound.
It turned out to be Chopin’s Ballade in G minor, opus 23, which has remained to this day, my favorite composition for solo piano by any composer.   
Curious to research about the history of Chopin’s first Ballade, I discovered that Chopin, while touring in the spring of 1831, learned of the Russian invasion of Warsaw.   Not only was he cut off from his family and friends, but also of his country.  According to Chopin’s diary, he felt grief, fear and rage and finally finished the piece, when he had been living in Paris four year later, in exile.   I definitely felt his range of emotions reflected in this nine and a half minute composition.  This was a much darker Chopin that I had grown accustomed to.
After rushing out to buy the piano music to the Ballades and discovering how extremely difficult it was for me to learn, I still aspired to the challenge.  I knew I didn’t have the necessary skills to tackle this piece, but was never discouraged.   
While attending college, pursuing my business degree, I would find myself during lunch hour, sneaking into college campus music rooms to practice the Ballade, sometimes even skipping my classes, knowing very well that I was never ever going to be good enough to be a concert pianist.   I finally learned how to be dedicated.
My arrival in Warsaw
Upon my arrival at the Frederic Chopin International Airport in Warsaw, it became very obvious to me that the International Chopin Piano Competition was probably the most prestigious music competition in the world; certainly for pianists.   As soon as I exited customs into the baggage claim area, I was struck with sudden inspiration of emotion, as I found myself gazing at the massive billboard of Chopin in the lobby that took up an entire whole wall of the terminal.  This is the birthplace of Chopin.

The massive lighted billboard sign at the Frederic Chopin International Airport

As soon as I found myself walking the streets of Warsaw, I noticed that there were Chopin posters not only on billboards, but also on the sides of busses, gates, lamp posts, and even, facades of buildings.  Stores carried not only Chopin CD’s, books and music scores, but clothing, chocolates, coffee mugs, key chains, postcards, toy pianos, and expensive jewelry…   

Even Chopin benches made of cast iron stone were scattered around town, including one that I encountered on Nowy Świat Street, across the palace, where the President resides.  The benches played 30 to 40 seconds of a Chopin melody at a touch of a button.   The benches were strategically placed to places somehow connected with the composer; near houses where he lived and taught while in Warsaw. 
Warsaw treats this event grander than the Olympics; and why not?  The Olympics only happen once every four years.  The International Chopin Piano Competition happens only once every five years.  In addition, this was the granddaddy of all anniversaries; Chopin’s monumental 200th Anniversary of his birth.  That happens only once.  Even if there was no competition this year, Poland would have a big enough reason to celebrate.  It was “Chopin-mania” here, and Warsaw made it perfectly clear that they were proud of their national hero.


Standing in the lobby of the Philharmonic, for my promo shot.

The Philharmonic and the Jury of the Competition
When I arrived at the Philharmonic for the first time, it was like a dream come true.  The Philharmonic is such a beautiful hall, with a ton of history, especially with the past Chopin competitions.  Instantly, I was thinking of some of my favorite pianists whose recordings I would constantly play over and over on LP, who won prizes in past competitions, and whom would eventually become internationally celebrated renowned pianists:  Pollini, Zimmerman, Argerich, Ashkenazy,  just to name a few.    



Television and camera crews took over the best angled spots of the Philharmonic, including right in front of the stage. 

The International jury (left to right):  Fou Ts’ong (People’s Republic of China), Dang Thai Son (Vietnam), Martha Argerich (Argentina), Nelson Freire (Brazil), Adam Harasiewicz (Poland), Bella Davidovich (Soviet Union), Andrzej Jasiński (Poland, chair), Philippe Entremont (France), Piotr Paleczny (Poland), Kevin Kenner (USA), Michie Koyama (Japan), and Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń (Poland).Un
I knew very little about this competition before going to into the festival.   First of all, I did not know that there were 160 pianists from last spring, auditioning for 80 open spots, that would open up the festival… and then cut in half after each stage, until the final stage of ten finalists are chosen.   I did not know that this was a three week event, and that most days would be split into mornings and afternoon sessions, of up to ten to eleven hour days, depending on the stages. 
I also did not know how time consuming it would be for the jury throughout competition.  If a jury member “clocked in” during the entire competition, they would have sat through 150 hours of music.  That doesn’t include intermissions, let alone meetings and overtime.
My only previous knowledge going into the competition was the famous international scandal that was created in 1980, making headlines, even in America, regarding Martha Argerich, when she protested and resigned from the jury because Ivo Pogorelich was not voted into the final stage of the competition by the other jurors.  
I’ve always wondered what would cause such a pianist to divide the jury in that manner.  It would have been fun to see the videotapes of Pogorelich performing, just to see what the commotion was about.  I also wondered if history could repeat itself.
The competition
Reducing the number of competitors from the cream of the crop seems like a very difficult task, indeed.  Especially, if you have pianists who vary widely as interpreters, much like Pogorelich did over twenty years ago.  As the jury announced the names who would continue after the second round, I agreed with them more than 75% of the time. 
I was disappointed to see some of my favorites be disqualified from advancing any further; notably, Airi Katada from Japan with her nuanced and soulful performance of the Barcarolle in F# major, which was one of my favorite performances at the festival.  Unfortunately, she didn’t even make the final twenty in the 3rd stage. 
Also, other notables that didn’t make the final round, who I preferred, were Jayson Gillham from Australia, Irene Veneziano from Italy, and Claire Huangci from the US.
After they announced the ten finalists, many people already had their “favorites” to win.   At this time, most everyone, including the Polish TV watchers that I had talked to in Warsaw, speculated it would be narrowed down to two pianists;  Ingolf Wunder, from Austria, or Evgeni Bozhanov, from Bulgaria.    Both pianists are true visionaries, and stood out in the front of the pack with their individual style of playing, whether or not you agreed they were playing “authentic” Chopin.  They were quite compelling, and at quite often, transcendental.  
When I first saw the animated Wunder perform in the second stage, swinging from left to right with his back arched, back and forth, I was thinking that he wasn’t actually playing the piano, but the piano was really playing him.  Part of me was also thinking that he was interpreting what a whimsical Mozart might do with Chopin’s music.  I was hearing Mozart; at least with the first three pieces that he played (Impromptu in G Flat Major, op 51, Scherzo in E major, op. 54, and the Waltz in A flat major, op.34,  no.1).   (Chopin, I later found out through research, had Mozart and Bach as his two major influences.) 
The longer compositions that he played were less about Mozart, and more about Chopin.  Wunder played the Andante spianato and polonaise in E-flat Major, op22 with nuanced authority.  However, it was his performance of the Polonaise-Fantasy in A Flat Major, op61 that completely showed off his exquisite skills, especially in its rousing conclusion.  His playing was illuminating, insightful, thrilling and poised, which is why he became the audience favorite, as well, as mine. 

Ingolf Wunder (Austria) after the press leaves after his dynamic performance of the 2nd stage.

Bozhanov, on the other hand, shapes and forms dynamic landscapes, with an atmosphere so organic that you can almost hear the thunderous storms turning into a trickle of water.   His expressive virtuosity captured nuanced sounds so compelling, as demonstrated in the third stage of the mazurkas, with its ringing rubato in the melody in the right hand, contrasted with a waltzing counterpoint in the left hand.  There was something very spiritual and hypnotic about his playing that deeply resonated in my soul.
 I’m unsure if even Chopin could have even imagined such a “soundscape” one could have been created from his compositions.   Like Chopin, Bozhanov also demands attention while painting music. 
Going into the final stage, I felt Bozhanov didn’t really need to make a statement with the Concerto.  With a very impressive second stage, and a standing ovation in the third stage, (I was second to stand in the Philharmonic), I felt Bozhanov was playing it safe during the morning rehearsal of the final stage.  I didn’t hear any of his usual unique trademarks that I heard in the previous stages, so I was surprised that was fairly conservative when playing with the National Philharmonic.
However, during the final stage performance, he switched back to his trademark playing.  Unfortunately, because of his choice of delicate pianissimos, the orchestra would occasionally drown him out.  Rather than playing the Concerto for Piano and Orchestra, he chose to play a Concerto for Piano versus Orchestra.  It didn’t help his final score when he played a very obvious sour note in the final movement of the Rondo, either.  After the concert, I asked him whether or not he had problems communicating with the conductor, Antonio Wit, during the performance.  He said there was no problem.

Evgeni Bozhanov (Bulgaria) during rehearsal with the Philharmonic, the morning of the final stage.

The announcement of the winner
Then the announcement was made, and most people were surprised, including the winner.  Yulianna Avdeeva, from Russia, took first place in the competition.  “I’m very surprised, but it’s a nice surprise”, Avdeeva said minutes after the announcement.  She was the first woman to ever win, since Martha Argerich, a juror, won it 45 years ago.   Most people expected Ingolf Wunder to win, after his heralded performance in the Final Stage, in which received a standing ovation for his Concerto.   
Verdict of the Jury - list of laureates of the 16th International Chopin Piano Competition:


Prize
No.

Name
Surname
Country
1
3
Ms
Yulianna
Russia
2
14
Mr
Lukas
Russia/Lithuania
2
79
Mr
Ingolf
Austria
3
72
Mr
Daniil
Russia
4
5
Mr
Evgeni
Bulgaria
5
9
Mr
François
France
6


not awarded



Yulianna Avdeeva (Russia), First place winner
Looking back at my own notes, I rated Avdeeva strongly, even though I had very slight reservations of her interpretation of the F-minor Fantasia during the second stage, compared to everything else she played.  The third stage was played to near perfection, as well.  The Sonata was powerful and extremely moving, and the Ballade in F minor was absolutely brilliant and poetic.  She was technically consistent throughout the stages; her playing was both bold and sensitive filled with depth and colours, accompanied by the most sensitive and passionate phrasing.  
Perhaps the judges really do reward those who come closer to Chopin’s spirit, like Avdeeva, leaving little room for personal interpretation.  After all, there were times in the competition that I felt I was hearing more from the artist, rather than the composer.   

Andrzej Jasiński announces the winners on behalf of the 12 jurors…

Unlike the Olympic Games, the participants of the competition do not have an idea of what their cumulative scores are, even after each stage is completed.   Only after the winner is announced, the jurors disclose the point tally of each of the rounds. 

Avdeeva scored the highest marks in each of the first three stages, with Bozhanov trailing closely behind.  Wunder, trailing far behind, scoring much less in the first two stages compared to Avdeeva and Bozhanov, was not even close before entering  the final stage.  The only way Avdeeva could have lost the competition, is if Bozhanov had come up with a solid performance of the Concerto during the final stage, since that was Avdeeva’s weakest category. 

Whether the case may be, Evgeni Bozhanov and Ingolf Wunder, with their insightful imagination and to their art of interpretation, will be the pianists that will be remembered at this event, much like Ivo Pogorelich in the 80’s.   To me, they deserve gold medals, as well.
Presentation of the Statutory Prizes Ceremony (recipients Yulianna Avdeeva (Russia), Francois Dumont (France), Danill Trifonov (Russia), Lukas Geniušas (Russia-Lithuania), Ingolf Wunder (Austria)) 
The best performance of a polonaise in Stage II: Lukas Geniušas
The best performance of mazurkas: Daniil Trifonov
The best performance of a concerto: Ingolf Wunder
The best performance of a sonata: Yulianna Avdeeva
The best performance of the Polonaise-Fantasy op. 61: Ingolf Wunder


Yulianna Avdeeva, with the Warsaw Philharmonic under the direction of Antoni Wit, after a performance of Chopin’s E minor concerto at the Prize Winner’s Concert at the Teatre Wielki – Polish National Opera, Moniuszko Auditorium

Inspiration
Looking back, I wish I had seriously studied piano much earlier in my “career”.  I’m sure I would have been easily inspired by Chopin, rather than by the Rolling Stones, and pursued my dream to become a concert pianist.  Also, I wished I could have witnessed the past International Chopin Piano Competitions during my childhood, since the participants alone are very inspirational.  If all this had occurred, I truly believe that I could have conceivably taken first prize at the 12th and  13th International Chopin Piano Competitions in 1985 and 1990, since the jury didn’t award anyone first prize those years.  I then would have participated in this year’s jury to change the outcome to my liking, as well.  What a “Wunderful” world that would have been.  Now, that is what I call “California Dreaming”.